(Continued from page 1) Following the Stewardship Council's vote on the Fells RMP the Friends of Fells executive director read a statement for the public record:
Application of RMP management policy that doesn't rest on facts and environmental principles is worse than mindless; it is inherently harmful to resources and visitors.
You have approved a resource damage plan for the Fells Reservation.
You have approved a RMP that directly contravenes its own proclaimed resource protection goals.
You have approved a RMP that directly contravenes its own proclaimed compliance goals.
You have approved a RMP that directly contravenes its own proclaimed stewardship partner goals.
You have approved a RMP that directly contravenes critical Stewardship Council RMP review standards, including key safety, remediation and enforcement issues.
You have turned your back on the primacy of resource protection.
By approving this RMP you join DCR saying NO to Sierra Club, NO to Mass Audubon, NO to Environment Mass, NO to the Environmental League of Massachusetts, NO to the Appalachian Mountain Club, NO to the six Fells district state legislators who have communicated with you, NO to the twenty-five years of service of the Friends of the Fells, NO to DCR Friends group organizations, NO to the majority demographic of Fells visitors (75% visit on foot) including families:
...all of whom for two years have begged DCR to demonstrate ability and will to impose remedial solutions to existing Fells resource and visitor impacts, including enforcement capacity, before considering expansion of bike access and uses.
You are saying NO to the fundamental principle Charles Eliot stated was the “primary and only justifying purpose” for creating the Urban Reservations: “for the enjoyment of that peaceful beauty of nature.”
Instead you have willfully chosen to embrace the RMP’s manipulative, deceitful claims, its selective dismissal of scientific data and visitor comments, and its gross misrepresentations of recreational ecology principles.
On these bases you approve a plan which serves only a special interest group, NEMBA, which, in its overt quest to convert every trail in the Fells to bike use, displacing those who would otherwise seek ‘enjoyment of that peaceful beauty of nature’ will be aided and abetted through use of thousands of dollars of annual federal highway funds funneled through the largesse of the Massachusetts Recreational Trail Advisory Board upon which NEMBA sits, a board appointed by the project manager of the Fells RMP who serves as the director of the DCR Recreational Trails Program.
During the December 20 Policy Committee meeting the Fells RMP project manager stated that after the RMP is adopted “We will find stakeholders who want to cooperate with us. If they don't they won’t be included in the future.”
In adopting this special interest driven Fells RMP the Stewardship Council has today joined DCR in ensuring which single stakeholder group this will be.
An October 5th, 2011 letter to the editor in Westminster, Mass, written by a mountain bike rider, characterizes the Fells Reservation as a “nationwide ‘flashpoint’ in the battle for bike trail access” and praises the ‘exhaustive’ Fells RMP for reaching conclusions that coincide with bike groups’ goals for expansion of bike access on trails in the Fells, Westminster and beyond.
It is easy to see why mountain bike organizations across the Commonwealth, and indeed the US, will thank you for your service, as you expand unfettered bike access throughout the Fells, to the detriment of all other values and all other visitors.
Mike Ryan, Friends of the Middlesex Fells Reservation